Paper | Title | Page |
---|---|---|
MOPMB078 | Design and Prototyping of the Electron Ion Collider Electron Storage Ring SRF Cavity | 293 |
|
||
Funding: Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics under contract DE-AC05-06OR23177 Among the EIC¿s numerous RF subsystems, the electron storage ring¿s (ESR) 591 MHz fundamental RF system is one of the most challenging. Each cavity in the system will handle up to 2.5 A of beam current and supply up to 600 kW beam power under a wide range of voltage. The EIC R&D plan includes the design, fabrication and testing of such a cavity. In this paper, we will report the latest status and findings of the ongoing design and prototyping of this cavity, including the RF and mechanical/thermal design, fabrication design, and the progress of fabrication. |
||
Poster MOPMB078 [1.489 MB] | ||
DOI • | reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-SRF2023-MOPMB078 | |
About • | Received ※ 12 June 2023 — Revised ※ 26 June 2023 — Accepted ※ 28 June 2023 — Issue date ※ 19 July 2023 | |
Cite • | reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml) | |
WEPWB120 | Flux Expulsion Testing for LCLS-II-HE Cavity Production | 876 |
|
||
Nitrogen-doped niobium SRF cavities are sensitive to trapped magnetic flux, which decreases the cavity intrinsic Q₀. Prior experimental results have shown that heat treatments to 900°C and higher can result in stronger flux expulsion during cooldown; the precise temperature required tends to vary by vendor lot/ingot of the niobium material used in the cavity cells. For LCLS-II-HE, to ensure sufficient flux expulsion in all cavities, we built and tested single-cell cavities to determine this required temperature for each vendor lot of niobium material to be used in cavity cells. In this report, we present the results of the single-cell flux expulsion testing and the Q₀ of the nine-cell cavities built using the characterized vendor lots. We discuss mixing material from different vendor lots, examine the lessons learned, and finally present an outlook on possible refinements to the single-cell technique. | ||
DOI • | reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-SRF2023-WEPWB120 | |
About • | Received ※ 15 June 2023 — Revised ※ 28 June 2023 — Accepted ※ 03 July 2023 — Issue date ※ 13 July 2023 | |
Cite • | reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml) | |